The same habit of mind, applied for four decades: find what is real, and measure what it is worth.

One discipline, proven across four decades: find what is real, and measure what it is worth.

A word on why this is here. Large firms don’t recount their principals’ formation, and ordinarily there would be no reason to. But what a client of this firm hires is this judgment, and the method rests on it — so it is set down the same way the method sets down any claim: with its source, its basis, and the proof. Not to impress. To show where the capability was actually built, and that it was lived rather than asserted.

The discipline is systems analysis — establishing what actually drives a complex system, and applying numbers to measure cause and effect. Every chapter since has been the same method entered in a new domain: start at the bottom, master it deliberately, then reason across it — seeing what specialists reasoning down a single field cannot. The pattern is consistent, and it is the point.

RAND — the discipline

Project Leader in the Systems Sciences Department of the RAND Corporation, the institution that originated systems analysis itself. The doctorate behind it was built across disciplines on purpose: offered a full fellowship at Cornell, Michael chose UCLA for one structural reason — it required master’s-level mastery in four fields but, unlike its peers, did not require them in one department. He spread them — international relations, quantitative politics, educational psychology (for statistical method on “soft” variables), and the MBA coursework at UCLA’s business school (completed; designation not carried, as he was not formally enrolled). The capacity it built: rigorous measurement of the qualitative, and reasoning across domains the academy keeps apart.

Hughes — the method, young

Among the first employees of Hughes Communications, organized to find the commercial markets a new generation of higher-power satellites could serve. The leading candidate was corporate video teleconferencing. Michael’s capacity analysis showed the mismatch was enormous — the capability so overshot even optimistic teleconferencing demand that the business case collapsed under its own surplus. That surplus was the signal: higher power also meant antennas small enough to mount on a house. The numbers pointed away from teleconferencing and toward delivering television directly to consumers — a step in the evolution that ran toward DirecTV. A junior seat, on watch, reading the numbers honestly. Direct-to-home television was the work of many hands over many years; nothing here is claimed beyond the analysis.

Law — Irell & Manella

Started at the bottom of corporate, securities, M&A, and technology law — and set himself a curriculum: identify every consequential type of extraordinary transaction (M&A buy- and sell-side, corporate finance, IPOs as issuer and underwriter) and represent both sides, twice, across half a dozen deals. After that deliberate traverse, he had seen roughly eighty percent of the variation in how these deals actually behave.

Wall Street, then his own firm

Hired as a technology investment banker at Rothschild in New York — again from the bottom, among only a handful brought onto the Street in the depths after the 1987 crash — and cross-trained across IPOs, secondaries, and M&A on both sides. He became the first nationwide Head of Technology Investment Banking for CIBC Oppenheimer. By 1991, enough clients had asked the firm to name him into “key-man” provisions that the conclusion was unavoidable: they were retaining the judgment, not the brand. He founded Kane & Company on that proposition. Three decades of closed strategic transactions have followed.

Three decades of closed strategic transactions.

Since founding the firm, Michael has evaluated hundreds of companies and transaction scenarios and interviewed thousands of executives, advising owners, controlling shareholders, and boards through business sales, mergers and acquisitions, IPOs, De-SPACs, and restructurings — public companies and substantial private ones. The practice spans the full lifecycle of a transaction: engagement strategy, value-element assessment, buyer identification, the buyer-specific case, and negotiation through close.

The through-line is the discipline above. Kane & Company does not sell businesses up from a comparable multiple. It isolates and sizes a client’s real contribution to a strategic acquirer’s value-build, and brings that case — traced, sourced, and measurable — to the principal equipped to price it. See the method in full →

A representative list of closed transactions is available to qualified parties under confidentiality.

The record.

Verify the securities-industry record on FINRA’s BrokerCheck.